March 1, 2004

NY Times Debate Diary

POST #    797

Sunday, the four remaining Democrats running for the Democratic Presidential nomination participated in a debate. Katharine Seelye did a running diary/analysis of the debate. As dry as this might sound, there was some interesting comments she made. I didn't watch the debate, so I don't really know what exactly was said, but I'm amused just by reading the commentary.

From her running diary:
2.29 | 11:54 AM
At the same time, Edwards seems better able to articulate these problems in accessible language.

2.29 | 11:53 AM
On North Korea, Kerry has a chance to show his breadth of understanding and historical perspective.

2.29 | 11:28 AM
As usual, Sharpton suddenly captures the bigger picture. Asked if Kerry was a liberal, Sharpton said that everyone looks like a liberal in comparison to George Bush.

2.29 | 11:25 AM
Just a few minutes into this debate it is clear that the candidates know how high the stakes are: with increasingly sharp attacks against each other, Kerry and Edwards know that Kerry needs to keep Edwards from gaining any kind of foothold on Tuesday that could keep his campaign going.

- NY Times: The Democratic Presidential Debate (Debate diary)
- NY Times: Edwards Attacks Kerry Sharply in Debate as Crucial Votes Near
- NY Times: Democratic Presidential Candidates Debate in New York (Debate transcript)
- CBS News: Debate NYC (Debate video)

Posted by tien mao in Politics at 9:07 AM

 

 

Sharpton always comes up with such good lines/comebacks.

Posted by: corie at March 1, 2004 9:29 AM

sharpton makes the whole process fun! and kucinich looks like a little troll/elf. i mean, those ears! they're huge!

Posted by: tien at March 1, 2004 9:39 AM

there was a bizarre kucinich parade down 7th avenue in park slope on saturday. it reminded me of a hari krishna march, which i sad, because i kind of like and a agree with many of kucinich's ideas...though i'd never vote for him.

Posted by: corie at March 1, 2004 9:47 AM

FYI Tien,
You forgot to post a mention of Dan's birthday last week.

Posted by: John at March 1, 2004 10:05 AM

i decided to cut down on the birthday posts. unless i'm actually celebrating with that person. i just couldn't keep coming up with the b-day commentary.

i did wish him a happy b-day though and wished him much love (and promised some lovin' if he really wanted it).

Posted by: tien at March 1, 2004 10:09 AM

corie, that sounds like an interesting parade. were people scratching their heads wondering who kucinich was?

i too seem to agree with kucinich's views the most. back in july, he was my ideal candidate. apparently, there is a new candidate chooser too, as my friend pointed out, but i have yet to take it.

Posted by: tien at March 1, 2004 10:14 AM

Kucinich is also the favorite of other people I know. Too bad he's not mediagenic enough. Seriously, Edwards, first term Senator, is getting by with his pretty boy looks. He may be smart, but still, the looks help.

Posted by: Jen at March 1, 2004 2:16 PM

Post a comment

 




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Previous : Apartment Update   |  Main   |   Next :  Stupid February
 
Powered by Movable Type